Predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures of the hip: Results from the national PPF study.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the hip joint are increasing in prevalence. In this collaborative study, we aimed to investigate the impact of patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and modes of management on in-hospital mortality of PPFs involving the hip. METHODS: Using a multi-centre cohort study design, we retrospectively identified adults presenting with a PPF around the hip over a 10-year period. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the independent correlation between patient, fracture, and treatment factors on mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,109 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%. Multivariable analyses suggested that age, male sex, abbreviated mental test score (AMTS), pneumonia, renal failure, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and deep surgical site infection were each independently associated with mortality. Each yearly increase in age independently correlates with a 7% increase in mortality (OR 1.07, p=0.019). The odds of mortality was 2.99 times higher for patients diagnosed with pneumonia during their hospital stay [OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.07-8.37) p=0.037], and 7.25 times higher for patients that developed renal failure during their stay [OR 7.25 (95% CI 1.85-28.47) p=0.005]. Patients with history of PVD have a six-fold greater mortality risk (OR 6.06, p=0.003). Mode of treatment was not a significant predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: The in-hospital mortality rate of PPFs around the hip exceeds 5%. The fracture subtype and mode of management are not independent predictors of mortality, while patient factors such as age, AMTS, history of PVD, pneumonia, and renal failure can independently predict mortality. Peri-operative optimisation of modifiable risk factors such as lung and kidney function in patients with PPFs around the hip during their hospital stay is of utmost importance.

Endovascular thrombectomy devices for acute limb ischemia management.

Acute limb ischemia still represents a challenge for the contemporary vascular surgeon, representing an immediate threat for patients' limb but potentially also for the proper patient life in some settings. Technology recently evolved and focused on the treatment of such complex situation. Several devices are available as of today allowing a complete acute limb ischemia endovascular management, aiming to remove intraluminal material while leaving the possibility for treating the underlying pathology when needed. In this review, proper specific device characteristics, indications and advantages are reported and discussed. Despite the broad spectrum of different available devices could appear as potentially confounding, each device has its own features, indications, weak and strength point. Ideally the modern endovascular surgeon should master every single tool, tailoring revascularization strategy and timing for the proper patient and arterial segment to be treated, maximizing the benefits coming from technological improvements.

Hybrid and open repair for patients with acute limb ischemia of the lower extremities.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid revascularization procedures for acute limb ischemia (ALI) are becoming increasingly common, bibliographic data on outcomes is however sparse. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients with ALI that underwent either surgical treatment (ST) or hybrid treatment (HT) between January 2015 and December 2021. The composite outcome of amputation-free survival (AFS) was the primary endpoint. Technical success, overall survival, amputation, and re-intervention rates were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: During the study period 266 patients (mean age 70.2±14.5 years; 49.6% males) were treated for ALI, 67.3% undergoing ST and 32.7% HT. HT was more frequently used in patients with a previous vascular intervention in the index limb (38/87; 43.7% HT vs. 40/179; 22.3% ST, P=0.001), a stent- or stent graft-occlusion (16/87; 18.4% HT vs. 10/179; 5.6% ST, P=0.002) and/or a bypass occlusion (16/87; 18.4% HT vs. 16/179; 8.9% ST, P=0.043). Technical success was higher in the OR group (75/87; 86.2% HT vs. 173/179; 96.6% ST, P=0.003). Amputation-free survival rate during follow-up (43/87; 49.4% HT vs. 94/179; 52.5% ST, HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.18, P=0.22) and overall survival (32/87; 36.8% HT vs. 84/179; 46.9% ST, HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.34, P=0.41) were comparable between the two groups. No statistical differences were observed between the groups regarding major amputation (19/87; 21.8% HT vs. 15/179; 8.4% ST, HR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.33 to 2.23, P=0.74) or reintervention during follow-up (45/87; 51.7% HT vs. 65/179; 36.3% ST, HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.51, P=0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid and open surgical treatments showed comparable results in our cohort, even though significantly more patients undergoing HT presented with stent and bypass occlusions rather than de-novo lesions.

[Preventive surgery after vascular reconstruction for chronic lower limb ischemia]. / Preventivnye khirurgicheskie vmeshatel'stva posle sosudistykh rekonstruktsii po povodu khronicheskoi ishemii nizhnikh konechnostei.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of redo reconstructions of lower limb arteries in patients with obliterating atherosclerosis, immediate and long-term results in patients who underwent reconstructive interventions with occlusion of previous reconstruction and preventive interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 43 patients. The main group (group 1) consisted of 18 patients who underwent preventive vascular reconstructions. The control group enrolled 25 patients who underwent redo interventions for occlusion of previous reconstructions. The control group was divided into 2 parts; 15 patients had chronic limb ischemia (group 2), 10 patients had acute limb ischemia (group 3). Mean age of patients was 56.8±8.2 years; there were 37 (86%) men and 6 (14%) women. Multifocal vascular atherosclerosis was noted in 41 (95.3%) patients, carotid artery lesion - 29 (70.7%), coronary artery disease - 34 (79%). Patients with type II diabetes mellitus were excluded. RESULTS: We chose each surgical intervention considering preoperative diagnostic data. Open, endovascular and hybrid interventions were performed. There were no deaths and limb amputations in the 1st group. Two (13.3%) amputations were registered in the 2nd group, 3 (30%) amputations and 1 (10%) death were registered in the 3rd group. The follow-up period was 24 months. An 18-month freedom from amputations was 71.5%, 78% and 38%, respectively (p<0.05 compared to the 1st and 2nd groups). CONCLUSION: Preventive surgical interventions prevent ischemia and amputation, as well as improves the results of redo surgery.

The management of patients with popliteal artery aneurysms presenting with acute limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair has acceptable outcomes compared with open repair for elective therapy. Endovascular repair for urgent PAA causing acute limb ischemia (ALI) has not been well-studied. This project compares outcomes of urgent endovascular and open repair of PAA with ALI. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database for peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) and infrainguinal bypass were reviewed for PAAs with ALI from 2010 to 2021. Only patients entered as having symptoms of ALI in the PVI module and ALI as indication in the infrainguinal bypass module were included. In addition, patients undergoing elective treatment were excluded and the sample analyzed was restricted to patients undergoing urgent and emergent open and endovascular repair. Patient demographics and comorbidities as well as procedural details were compared between the two groups. Perioperative complications up to 30 days were compared as well as long-term outcomes including major amputation and mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: Urgent PAA repair for ALI constituted 10.5% (n = 571) of all PAAs. Most urgent repairs were open (80.6%; n = 460) with 19.4% (n = 111) endovascular. The proportion of endovascular repair significantly increased from 16.7% in 2010 to 85.7% in 2021. Patients undergoing endovascular repair were older (71.2 ± 12.5 vs 68.0 ± 11.8; P = .011) than patients undergoing open repair. They were also more likely to have coronary artery disease (32.4% vs 21.7%; P = .006). Open PAA repair was associated with more bleeding complications (20.8% vs 2.7%; P < .001), longer postoperative length of stay (8.1 ± 9.3 days vs 4.9 ± 5.6 days; P < .001), and less likelihood of discharge to home (64.9% vs 70.3%; P = .051). Perioperative major amputation rate was 7.5% with no difference between the two treatment strategies up to 1 year. However, patients receiving endovascular repair had higher inpatient (1.1% vs 0%; P < .001), 30-day (6.3% vs 0.4%; P < .001), and 1-year (16.5% vs 8.4%; P = .02) mortality. Multivariable regression analysis suggested that endovascular repair was possibly associated with increased 30-day mortality, but not 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular PAA has exponentially increased from 2010 to 2021. Endovascular repair is associated with decreased complications and hospital length of stay. The increased perioperative mortality seen in this group is likely due to selection bias.

Child-Pugh Class B or C Liver Disease Increases the Risk of Early Mortality in Patients With Hepatitis C Undergoing Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty Regardless of Treatment Status.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) undergoing primary elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are at increased risk of postoperative complications. Patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, specifically Child-Pugh Class B and C, who are undergoing general surgery have high 2-year mortality risks, approaching 60% to 80%. However, the role of Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease classifications of liver status in predicting survivorship among patients with HCV undergoing elective arthroplasty has not been elucidated. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What factors are independently associated with early mortality (< 2 years) in patients with HCV undergoing arthroplasty? METHODS: We performed a retrospective study at three tertiary academic medical centers and identified patients with HCV undergoing primary elective TJA between January 2005 and December 2019. Patients who underwent revision TJA and simultaneous primary TJA were excluded. A total of 226 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. A further 25% (57) were excluded because they were lost to follow-up before the minimum study requirement of 2 years of follow-up or had incomplete datasets. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, the final cohort consisted of 75% (169 of 226) of the initial patient population eligible for analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 53 ± 29 months. We compared confounding variables for mortality between patients with early mortality (16 patients) and surviving patients (153 patients), including comorbidities, HCV and liver characteristics, HCV treatment, and postoperative medical and surgical complications. Patients with early postoperative mortality were more likely to have an associated advanced Child-Pugh classification and comorbidities including peripheral vascular disease, end-stage renal disease, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, both groups had similar 90-day and 1-year medical complication risks including myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and reoperations for periprosthetic joint infection and mechanical failure. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with early mortality, incorporating all significant variables with p < 0.05 present in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: After accounting for significant variables in the univariate analysis such as peripheral vascular disease, end-stage renal disease, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and liver fibrosis staging, Child-Pugh Class B or C classification was found to be the sole factor independently associated with increased odds of early (within 2 years) mortality in patients with HCV undergoing elective TJA (adjusted odds ratio 29 [95% confidence interval 5 to 174]; p < 0.001). The risk of early mortality in patients with Child-Pugh Class B or C was 64% (seven of 11) compared with 6% (nine of 158) in patients with Child-Pugh Class A (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with HCV and a Child-Pugh Class B or C at the time of elective TJA had substantially increased odds of death, regardless of liver function, cirrhosis, age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease level, HCV treatment, and viral load status. This is similar to the risk of early mortality observed in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing abdominal and cardiac surgery. Surgeons should avoid these major elective procedures in patients with Child-Pugh Class B or C whenever possible. For patients who feel their arthritic symptoms and pain are unbearable, surgeons need to be clear that the risk of death is considerably elevated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Impact of Revascularization Technique on the Outcomes of Peripheral Graft Revision Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The acute occlusion of a peripheral bypass graft leads to acute limb ischemia (ALI) and threatens the viability of the limb if left untreated. The aim of the present study was to analyze the results of surgical and hybrid revascularization techniques for patients with ALI due to peripheral graft occlusions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 102 patients undergoing treatment for ALI due to peripheral graft occlusion between 2002 and 2021 was carried out at a tertiary vascular center. Procedures were classified as surgical when only surgical techniques were used and as hybrid when surgical procedures were combined with endovascular techniques such as balloon or stent angioplasty or thrombolysis. Endpoints were primary and secondary patency and amputation-free survival after 1 and 3 years. RESULTS: Of all patients, 67 met the inclusion criteria, 41 were treated surgically and 26 by hybrid procedures. There were no significant differences in the 30-day patency rate, 30-day amputation rate, and 30-day mortality. The 1- and 3-year primary patency rates were 41.4% and 29.2% overall, respectively; 45% and 32.1% in the surgical group, respectively; and 33.2% and 26.6% in the hybrid group, respectively. The 1- and 3-year secondary patency rates were 54.1% and 35.8% overall, respectively; 52.5% and 34.2% in the surgical group, respectively; and 54.4% and 43.5% in the hybrid group, respectively. The 1- and 3-year amputation-free survival rates were 67.5% and 59.2%, overall, respectively; 67.3% and 67.3% in the surgical group, respectively; and 68.5% and 48.2% in the hybrid group, respectively. There were no significant differences between the surgical and the hybrid groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of surgical and hybrid procedures after bypass thrombectomy for ALI to eliminate the cause of infrainguinal bypass occlusion are comparable with good midterm results in terms of amputation-free survival. New endovascular techniques and devices need to be established in comparison to the results of these proven surgical revascularization methods.

Acute limb ischemia.

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is an emergency situation requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. Although the traditional treating strategy for ALI includes open surgery, novel endovascular techniques have been introduced during the last decade. Additionally, many new cases of ALI have been reported due to infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The aim of this study was to present an updated overview of characteristics, diagnosis, and current treating strategies of patients with ALI.

Thromboembolectomy for acute lower limb ischemia: Contemporary outcomes of two surgical methods from a single tertiary center.

OBJECTIVES: The current treatment of acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) includes open surgical and percutaneous pharmaco-mechanical thromboembolectomy (TE). We hereby report our results with open surgical TE over a 10-year period and compare our outcomes using routine fluoroscopic assisted TE (FATE) with blind and selective on demand fluoroscopic-assisted TE (BSTE). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent open surgical TE for acute lower limb ischemia at a single tertiary center between 2008 and 2018. Patients were divided into a group who underwent BSTE and another who underwent routine FATE. Data on presentation, medical history, surgery performed, and short-term outcomes were retrieved from medical record. Comparison between baseline characteristics and outcomes of both groups were made using t-test and chi-square analysis. RESULTS: Over 10 years, 108 patients underwent surgical TE. Thirty-day mortality rate and 30-day major lower extremity amputation rate in the cohort were 12.0% and 6.5%, respectively. On subgroup analysis, 53 patients were treated by BSTE and 55 patients by FATE. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality rate (11.3% vs 12.7%, p-value = .82) and 30-day major amputation rate (9.4% vs 3.6%, p-value = .454) between the two groups. Local anesthesia was more frequently performed in patients undergoing FATE (58.2% vs 24.5%, p-value < .001). More than one arteriotomy was more frequently required in patients undergoing BSTE (2.6% vs 45.5%, p-value < .001). Patients with infrapopliteal involvement undergoing FATE required less further interventions such as patch angioplasty (2.6% vs 36.4%, p-value < .001) and bypass (2.6% vs 22.7%, p-value = .01). CONCLUSION: ALLI remains a disease of high morbidity and mortality. Open surgical TE offers an effective approach to treat ALLI. The addition of fluoroscopy to the conduction of TE could be associated with valuable benefits, especially in patients with infra-popliteal involvement. Randomized controlled trials are needed to objectively assess the therapeutic potential of FATE.

Automated Electronic Frailty Index is Associated with Non-home Discharge in Patients Undergoing Open Revascularization for Peripheral Vascular Disease.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with adverse surgical outcomes including post-operative complications, needs for post-acute care, and mortality. While multiple frailty screening tools exist, most are time and resource intensive. Here we examine the association of an automated electronic frailty index (eFI), derived from routine data in the Electronic Health Record (EHR), with outcomes in vascular surgery patients undergoing open, lower extremity revascularization. METHODS: A retrospective analysis at a single academic medical center from 2015 to 2019 was completed. Information extracted from the EHR included demographics, eFI, comorbidity, and procedure type. Frailty status was defined as fit (eFI≤0.10), pre-frail (0.100.21). Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and non-home discharge. RESULTS: We included 295 patients (mean age 65.9 years; 31% female), with the majority classified as pre-frail (57%) or frail (32%). Frail patients exhibited a higher degree of comorbidity and were more likely to be classified as American Society of Anesthesiologist class IV (frail: 46%, pre-frail: 27%, and fit: 18%, P = 0.0012). There were no statistically significant differences in procedure type, LOS, or 30-day readmissions based on eFI. Frail patients were more likely to expire in the hospital or be discharged to an acute care facility (31%) compared to pre-frail (14%) and fit patients (15%, P = 0.002). Adjusting for comorbidity, risk of non-home discharge was higher comparing frail to pre-frail patients (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.40-6.48). DISCUSSION: Frail patients, based on eFI, undergoing elective, open, lower extremity revascularization were twice as likely to not be discharged home.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of early and late outcomes after endovascular angioplasty among patients with thromboangiitis obliterans and chronic limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: No consensus has yet been reached regarding the optimal treatment of patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TO) and chronic limb ischemia. In the present study, we aimed to summarize the results on endovascular treatment of such patients. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The eligible studies had been reported up to December 2021 and had evaluated endovascular angioplasty to treat patients with TO and chronic limb ischemia. The early (mortality and technical success) and late (primary/secondary patency and limb salvage) outcomes were evaluated. StatsDirect (StatsDirect Ltd, Merseyside, UK) was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 15 eligible studies were included (only endovascular in 11 studies and both endovascular and open repair in 4 studies). Among 601 patients, 402 endovascular procedures (416 limbs) were recorded (angioplasty plus stenting for 7.2% and angioplasty plus thrombolysis for 3.7%). The clinical presentation was intermittent claudication (stage II-III) for 7.9% of the patients and critical ischemia (stage IV-VI) for 92.1% of the patients. Most of the patients had had lesions below the knee, and five had had upper extremity lesions. The pooled technical success rate was 86% (range, 81.1%-90.3%), with no in-hospital mortality. The other complications included perforations (1.9%), wound complications (2.2%), and distal embolism (0.2%). Primary patency was 65.7% (range, 52.7%-77.6%) at 12 months and 50.7% (range, 23.3%-77.9%) at 36 months. Secondary patency was 76.2% (range, 57.5%-90.8%) at 12 months and 64.5% (range, 32.3%-90.6%) at 36 months. The limb salvage rate was 94.1% (range, 90.7%-96.7%) at 12 months and 89.1% (range, 80.6%-95.4%) at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular angioplasty for patients with TO and chronic limb ischemia was associated with optimal safety and low complication rates. The technical success and late outcomes were acceptable.

[Acute limb ischemia : Quick review for residents in interventional radiology]. / Akuter peripherer Gefäßverschluss : Übersicht für den angehenden interventionellen Radiologen bei akuter Ischämie der unteren Extremität.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of diagnosis and treatment of acute limb ischemia is essential to preserve limb viability and prevent irreversible damage. OBJECTIVE: A brief review of treatment options, patient selection, and management in acute limb ischemia is provided for residents in interventional radiology. METHODS: The most commonly used interventional treatment options in acute limb ischemia including case studies and recommendations are provided. RESULTS: In acute limb ischemia, the decision between therapeutic procedures (interventional or surgical) depends on the clinical stage. There are three main interventional procedures: catheter-directed thrombolysis, thromboaspiration, and mechanical thrombectomy using specialized catheters; a combination of these procedures is also possible. The decision depends on various factors, some of which are center-specific, and should therefore always be made by interdisciplinary consensus. After near-complete revascularization, the cause should be sought and eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: In a case of suspected acute limb ischemia, patients should ideally be taken to an interdisciplinary center with interventional radiology and vascular surgery. After clinical evaluation and noninvasive imaging, a decision regarding possible therapeutic options can be made.

An anatomical study of the tibial nerve branches innervating the posterior tibial artery.

The arteries of the lower limbs are innervated by vascular branches (VBs) originating from the lumbar sympathetic trunk and branches of the spinal nerve. Although lumbar sympathectomy is used to treat nonreconstructive critical lower limb ischemia (CLLI), it has limited long-term effects. In addition, the anatomical structure of tibial nerve (TN) VBs remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to clarify their anatomy and better inform the surgical approach for nonreconstructive CLLI. Thirty-six adult cadavers were dissected under surgical microscopy to observe the patterns and origin points of VBs under direct vision. The calves were anatomically divided into five equal segments, and the number of VB origin points found in each was expressed as a proportion of the total found in the whole calf. Immunofluorescence staining was used to identify the sympathetic nerve fibers of the VBs. Our results showed that the TN gave off 3-4 VBs to innervate the posterior tibial artery (PTA), and the distances between VBs origin points and the medial tibial condyle were: 24.7 ± 16.3 mm, 91.7 ± 66.1 mm, 199.6 ± 52.0 mm, 231.7 ± 38.5 mm, respectively. They were mainly located in the first (40.46%) and fourth (31.68%) calf segments, and immunofluorescence staining showed that they contained tyrosine hydroxylase-positive sympathetic nerve fibers. These findings indicate that the TN gives off VBs to innervate the PTA and that these contain sympathetic nerve fibers. Therefore, these VBs may need to be cut to surgically treat nonreconstructable CLLI.

Acute Limb Ischemia in Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: To determine the outcome of children treated for acute limb ischemia (ALI) in pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study including all patients diagnosed with ALI between 2005 and 2022 in 2 different pediatric ICUs: respiratory and cardiac ICU. Data collected included patients demographics and comorbidities, location and cause of arterial occlusion, and type and duration of therapy. Primary end point was freedom from amputation. Secondary end point was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients (58% male) with ALI were included in the study. Median age was 3.8 months (range 0.03-201). The lower extremity was involved in 55 (70%) patients. The limb ischemia was caused by arterial instrumentation in 94% of the patients. Anticoagulation was administered as the first-line therapy in all patients. Unfractionated heparin was administered for a median duration of 5 days (range 1-48). Low molecular weight heparin was continued for a median period of 28 days (range 4-420). Thrombolytic therapy was administered in 5 patients and 2 required surgical revascularization, all for failure of anticoagulation therapy. Mean follow-up was 21 months (range 1-188 months). None of the patients required major upper or lower extremity amputations during or after the index admission. Overall survival at 30 months was 68%. The causes of mortalities were unrelated to the limb ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: This large, single-center study demonstrates that ALI in the pediatric ICU population can be treated conservatively and is associated with a low amputation rate following nonoperative management. The favorable outcome exists regardless of the etiology of the ALI and underlying diseases.

Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization for Acute Limb Ischemia in COVID-19 Patients Comparing to Noninfected Cohort: A Single-Center Observational Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of surgical revascularization for acute limb ischemia (ALI) in 2 groups of patients-with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: During the 2 years (01.01.2020-31.12.2021) all consecutive patients diagnosed with ALI and treated with urgent revascularization were prospectively enrolled. Based on the results of polymerase chain reaction swab for SARS-CoV-2 infection patients were allocated to group A-infected or group B-noninfected. Demographic characteristics, clinical, imaging, laboratory data, and details of treatment were collected prospectively. The composite endpoint of major amputation and/or death at 30 days after surgery was defined as main study outcome. The postoperative ankle-brachial index value, reinterventions, complications, and length of hospital stay were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 130 patients (139 limbs with ALI) were analyzed-21 patients (23 limbs) in group A and 109 patients (116 limbs) in group B. The anatomical site of arterial occlusion, duration, and severity of ischemia did not differ significantly between the groups. Patients with COVID-19 had significantly shorter time from ALI onset till administration of the first dose of anticoagulant: 8 (2.5-24) hr vs. 15.7 (6-72) hr in group B, P = 0.02. Vascular imaging was performed before intervention only in 5 (23.8%) infected patients compared to 78 (71.5%) patients in group B, P < 0.001. The main outcome was registered in 38 (29.2%) patients, significantly more frequent in infected cohort: 12 (57.1%) patients in group A versus 26 (23.8%) in group B, P = 0.003. Difference was preponderantly caused by high mortality in group A-9 (42.8%) patients, compared to 17 (15.5%) patients in group B, P = 0.01. The difference in the rate of limb loss was not statistically significant: 4 (17.3%) limbs were amputated in COVID-19 patients and 12 (10.3%) limbs-in noninfected patients (P = 0.3). Combination of ALI and COVID-19 resulted in increased 30-day mortality-risk ratio (RR) 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-5.31), P = 0.002, but did not lead to significantly higher amputation rate-RR 1.6 (95% CI: 0.59-4.75), P = 0.32. In group A initial admission of the patient in the intensive care unit was an independent risk factor for amputation/death. Excepting systemic complications which were more frequently registered among COVID-19 patients: 7 (33%) cases vs. 14 (12.8%) in group B, P = 0.04; no differences in other secondary outcomes were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Study demonstrates the significant negative impact of COVID-19 upon the 30-day amputation-free survival in patients undergoing urgent surgical revascularization for ALI. The difference in outcome is influenced by higher rate of mortality among infected patients, rather than by the rate of limb loss. Severity of COVID-19, namely requirement of intensive care, mostly determines the outcome of ALI treatment.

Amputation and mortality rates of patients undergoing upper or lower limb surgical embolectomy and their predictors.

PURPOSE: To provide information on the outcomes of upper and lower limb surgical embolectomies and the factors influencing amputation and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center analysis of 347 patients (female, N = 207; male, N = 140; median age, 76 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 63.2-82.6 years]) with acute upper or lower limb ischemia due to thromboembolism who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2019 was carried out. Patient demographics, comorbidities, medical history, the severity of acute limb ischemia (ALI), preoperative medication regimen, embolus/thrombus localization, procedural data, in-hospital complications/adverse events and their related interventions, and 30-day mortality were reviewed in electronic medical records. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test; in addition, univariate and multivariate logistic regression was conducted. RESULTS: The embolus/thrombus was localized to the upper limb in 134 patients (38.6%) and the lower limb in 213 patients (61.4%). The median length of hospital stay was 3.8 days (IQR, 2.1-6.6 days). The in-hospital major amputation rates for the upper limb, lower limb, and total patient population were 2.2%, 14.1%, and 9.5%, respectively, and the in-hospital plus 30-day mortality rates were 4.5%, 9.4%, and 7.5%, respectively. In patients with lower limb embolectomy, the predictor of in-hospital major amputation was the time between the onset of symptoms and embolectomy (OR, 1.78), while the predictor of in-hospital plus 30-day mortality was previous stroke (OR, 7.16). In the overall patient cohort, there were two predictors of in-hospital major amputation: 1) the time between the onset of symptoms and embolectomy (OR, 1.92) and 2) compartment syndrome (OR, 3.51). CONCLUSION: Amputation and mortality rates after surgical embolectomies in patients with ALI are high. Patients with prolonged admission time, compartment syndrome, and history of stroke are at increased risk of limb loss or death. To avoid amputation and death, patients with ALI should undergo surgical intervention as soon as possible and receive close monitoring in the peri- and postprocedural periods.

Trans tibial amputation with or without a tourniquet in patients with diabetic foot infection and peripheral vascular disease: Comparison of postoperative outcomes.

Background: Transtibial amputation (TTA) due to complications of diabetic foot infection (DFI) or peripheral vascular disease (PVD) is a high-risk procedure in fragile patients. The risks of reoperation, blood loss requiring blood transfusion, and mortality are high. The use of a tourniquet in this procedure is controversial and scarcely reported. Objective: this study aimed to compare the outcomes of TTAs with or without a tourniquet in a single tertiary medical center. Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients who had undergone TTA in our institution (1/2019-1/2020) and included only those who underwent the procedure due to complications of DFI or PVD (n = 69). The retrieved data included demographics, comorbidities, ASA score, the use of a tourniquet, operation duration, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels, administration of blood transfusions, hospitalization length, surgical site infection and 60-days reoperation and mortality rates. Results: TTA with a tourniquet was superior to TTA without a tourniquet in reducing the average operation length by 11 min (p = 0.05), the median postoperative hospitalization by 6 days (p = 0.04), and the use of blood transfusions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.176, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.031-0.996). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated advantages in operative time, hospitalization length, and blood transfusion requirement for TTA with a tourniquet compared to TTA without a tourniquet.

Preliminary Experience With the Human Acellular Vessel: A Descriptive Case Series Detailing Early Use of a Bioengineered Blood Vessel for Arterial Repair.

BACKGROUND: An infection-resistant, immediately available conduit for trauma and urgent vascular reconstruction remains a critical need for successful limb salvage. While autologous vein remains the gold standard, vein-limited patients and size mismatch are common issues. The Human Acellular Vessel (HAV) (Humacyte, Inc., Durham, NC) is a bioengineered conduit with off-the-shelf availability and resistance to infection, ideal characteristics for patients with challenging revascularization scenarios. This report describes HAV implantation in patients with complex limb-threatening ischemia and limited conduit options who may have otherwise faced limb loss. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded-access program was used to allow urgent implantation of the HAV for arterial reconstruction. Electronic medical records were reviewed with extraction of relevant data including patient demographics, surgical implantation, patency, infectious complications, and mortality. RESULTS: The HAV was implanted in 8 patients requiring vascular reconstruction. Graft or soft tissue infection was present in 2 patients. One patient with severe penetrating pelvic injury had 4 HAV placed to repair bilateral external iliac artery and vein injuries. There was 1 technical failure due to poor outflow, 2 patients died unrelated to HAV use, and 5 lower extremity bypasses maintained patency at an average of 11.4 months (range: 4-20 months). No HAV infectious complications were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This report is the first United States series describing early outcomes using the HAV under the FDA expanded-access program for urgent vascular reconstruction. The HAV demonstrates resistance to infection, reliable patency, and offers surgeons an immediate option when confronted with complex revascularization scenarios. Assessment of long-term outcomes will be important for future studies.

Unexpected arterial thrombosis and acute limb ischemia in COVID-19 patients. Results from the Ibero-Latin American acute arterial thrombosis registry in COVID-19: (ARTICO-19).

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have focused on arterial thrombosis and acute limb ischemia in COVID-19. This international registry intended to study the spectrum of clinical characteristics, therapeutic trends, and outcomes in a cohort of Ibero-Latin American patients with arterial thrombosis or acute limb ischemia and COVID-19. METHODS: Data were retrospectively obtained from 21 centers in 9 countries. Patients with proven COVID-19 and asymptomatic or symptomatic arterial thrombosis were included. COVID-19 diagnosis was established by RT-PCR assay or IgM serology plus suggestive clinical/radiographical findings. We recorded and analyzed variables related to demography, clinical presentation, therapeutic trends, and outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty one patients were included in the registry. In 38.3%, acute limb ischemia symptoms were the first manifestation of COVID-19. Non-surgical management was more frequent in severe cases than surgical interventions, 11.1% vs. 88.9%, respectively (p = 0.004). Amputation rates were similar between all COVID severity groups (p = 0.807). Treatment was classified as non-surgical, open surgical, and endovascular treatment. Further analysis revealed an equal frequency of major leg amputation between treatment groups and increased mortality in patients with non-surgical management. However, multivariate regression analysis showed that treatment choices are associated with disease severity, with significant non-surgical treatment in critical patients; thus, mortality is related to the severity and confounds treatment analysis. CONCLUSION: Arterial thrombosis can be the initial symptom of a patient presenting with COVID-19. Physicians and health workers should potentially suspect COVID-19 in acute ischemia cases without a known risk factor or embolic cause. More experimental and clinical research is required to understand the complex phenomenon of arterial COVID-19 induced coagulopathy fully.